Vortex/t undertakes a hermeneutical exploration of symbolic turbulence in
many canonical works of literature and philosophy. Charles Minahen's
approach is diachronic to the degree that manifestations of the
symbol are addressed chronologically, but his aim is not to establish
a historical linking of cause and effect, even if such connections
do appear. Rather, a synchrony of the symbol is reconstructed that
places each discrete example of it in a vibrant intertext of patent
and latent meanings.
Symbolic turbulence
first emerges in ancient "whirls" that display a spiral, spiro-helical,
or vertical configuration and usually have cosmic or religious significance.The
first significant textual examples of vertical symbolism occur in
the Boulak Papyrus, the Bible, and The Odyssey, where the
destructive connotations of the symbol stand out. For the philosophers
and poets of the ancient classical period, including certain Pre-Socrates,
Plato, Epicurus, and Lucretius, the vortex is a universal structuring
principle, although the underlying causes vary. For Dante, the emphasis
is no longer on the dynamic cosmogonic role of the whirl, but on
the gradations inherent in the vertical structure itself. Descartes
and Blake associated the symbol with the transcendence of a mystical
vision, which involves, for the latter, an epiphanal breakthrough.
In Poe, the maelstrom excites conflicting feelings of horror in
the face of death and curiosity about the "novel" beyond. Rimbaud
develops Blake's and Poe's fascination with a transcendent vision,
but for Mallarme, the vortex-symbol is Poesque in the more negative
way. Not only is it a threatening destructive force, it is the specter
of death itself, relentlessly drawing the shipwrecked mariner to
ultimate extinction and nonentity.
By analyzing,
comparing, and contrasting these salient examples of vertical symbolism, Vortex/t attempts to uncover and explore the dynamics of
emerging and receding meanings that constitute the paradigm''s complexity.
|
|
|