Winner of the 1993 James Holly Hanford Award
(Milton Society of America)
"Robert
Fallon has reconstructed Milton's career by a thoughtful retracing
of where and how foreign policy was made in the 1650s. This is itself
a signal service for historians. He has also trawled his way through
the uncalendared and poorly listed State Papers Foreign. I would want
to return to such a study again and again for information. Miltonists
will have an augmented canon as a result of these searches."-John
Morrill, Selwyn College, Cambridge
For students of the poet, Robert Fallon's Milton in Government fills a gap in modern knowledge of his life, the ten years he labored
as Secretary for Foreign Languages to the English Republic. For
Interregnum historians, the book offers a study of the international
affairs of the Republic from a unique perspective, as well as a
detailed analysis of the government bureaucracy that conceived and
articulated foreign policy during the 1650s.
Milton's decade of public service to the English Republic, and
the collection of State Papers which are the product of those years,
have been either misunderstood or largely ignored by Miltonists,
and their influence upon his poetry all but dismissed. Making extensive
use of the State Papers Foreign in the Public Record Office, hitherto
overlooked by literary scholars, and the Calendar of State Papers
Domestic, Fallon offers the first definitive description of the
poet's place in government. He finds Milton to be an indefatigable
and highly knowledgeable public servant, closely involved in the
expression of foreign policy, and responsible for many more documents
than have been previously ascribed to him. His State Letters reveal
him as a man intimately aware of international events, a consideration
which leaves little doubt that his experience in government had
a significant influence on his creative imagination.
Fallon also provides a reading of Milton's tracts of 1659-1660,
tracing the influence of a decade of public service in his political
philosophy and questioning historians' conclusions that he was repudiating
Cromwell's Protectorate in his appeal to stave off the Restoration. |
|
|