| "This
is a wise and sane book that engages large and important issues, the
significance of which will be felt not only by those immediately concerned
with Milton and his cultural milieu but by those more generally concerned
with the political implications of poetic texts."—Michael Lieb, University
of Illinois at Chicago
In Divided Empire, Robert T. Fallon examines the influence
of John Milton's political experience on his great poems: Paradise
Lost, Paradise Regained, and Samson Agonistes. This study
is a natural sequel to Fallon's previous book, Milton in Government, which examined Milton's decade of service as Secretary for Foreign
Languages to the English Republic.
Milton's works are crowded with political figures—kings, counselors,
senators, soldiers, and envoys—all engaged in a comparable variety
of public acts—debate, decree, diplomacy, and warfare—in a manner
similar to those who exercised power on the world stage during his
time in public office. Traditionally, scholars have cited this imagery
for two purposes: first, to support studies of the poet's political
allegiances as reflected in his prose and his life; and, second,
to demonstrate that his works are sympathetic to certain ideological
positions popular in present times.
Fallon argues that Paradise Lost is not a political testament,
however, and to read its lines as a critique of allegiances and
ideologies outside the work is limit the range and scope of critical
inquiry and to miss the larger purpose of the political imagery
within the poem. That imagery, the author proposes, like that of
all Milton's later works, serves to illuminate the spiritual message,
a vision of the human soul caught up in the struggle between vast
metaphysical forces of good and evil. Fallon seeks to enlarge the
range of critical inquiry by assessing the influence of personal
and historical events upon art, asking, as he puts it, "not what
the poetry says about the events, but what the events say about
the poetry." Divided Empire probes, not Milton's judgment
on his sources, but the use he made of them.
|
|
|