| "This
is a brief book, easily read but worth reading twice or more. It clarifies,
confirms and challenges. It informs and inspires. Tole, lege."-Bibliotheque
d'humanisme et Renaissance
"Kort's writing renders his archaeology of the most difficult philosophers
in the West into a remarkably easy read-and his rhetorical gentleness
renders a radical argument into a deceptively natural reading. The
book has transformatory impact because Kort has, in convincing fashion,
rewritten the intellectual history of postmodern academe."-Peter
Ochs, author of Reading Peirce's Pragmatism: Philosophy, Theology,
and the Logic of Scripture
"This is a most interesting way of approaching the whole terrain
of hermeneutics. I often found myself seeing things from a new and
rewarding angle. One of the interesting elements of the discussion
is the way in which interpretation of the biblical text is brought
into dialogue with interpretation of non-biblical texts-and, indeed,
with interpretation of things other than texts. There is a lot of
learning evident in the book. The learning is draped gracefully
over the shoulder; but it is there."-Nicholas Wolterstorff, author
of John Locke and the Ethics of Belief
This book deals with the role of the category of "scripture" within
adequate theories of textuality and culture. Wesley Kort is interested
in the practice of reading a text as though it were scripture. Beginning
with John Calvin's theory of reading, Kort shows that the theory
and practice of reading as detailed by Calvin are applied to other
texts that begin to be read as scripture and eventually, in the
modern period, replace the reading of the Bible as scripture. These
alternative texts are, beginning in the sixteenth century, nature,
then, in the early eighteenth century, history, and, at the beginning
of the nineteenth century, literature.
Kort argues that what we take as modernity is based on a practice
of reading, not in what it means to read, but in what texts are
read as scripture. He argues that the postmodernist attempt not
to read anything at all as scripture is an illusion that the theories
of reading of Maurice Blanchot and Julia Kristeva expose. In conclusion,
Kort raises the question of what it might mean today to again read
the Bible as though it were scripture, that is, to read the Bible
with practices indicated by Blanchot and Kristeva. This study will
be of interest not only to those in religious studies and theology
but also to cultural historians and literary theorists. |
|
|
Wesley
A. Kort is Professor of Religion and Literary Studies at
Duke University. His most recent books, both with Penn State, are Bound to Differ: The Dynamics of Theological Discourses (1992)
and Story, Text, and Scripture: Literary Interest in Biblical
Narrative (1988).
|
|
|