| "John
Pearson has written an insightful and well-documented analysis which
every James scholar will have to read but which may also be of great
interest to scholars interested in the history of fictional theory
and the role Jamesian aesthetics played in the development of that
theory."-English Studies
"Pearson's work is a significant contribution to James studies
and to the larger project of mapping the history of early modern
literature. . . . He is right on target when he argues for a reading
of the prefaces within the context of the Edition as authorial performance-which
is to say, within the context of the 'semiotic field' in which they
originally appeared."- David McWhirter, Texas A & M University-College
Station
The first decade of the twentieth century saw Henry James at work
selecting and revising his novels and tales for a collection of
his work known as the New York Edition. James not only made extensive
revisions of his early works; he added eighteen prefaces that provide
what many readers believe to be the best commentary on his fiction.
John Pearson argues here for a reading of the prefaces within the
context of the New York Edition as James's attempt to construct
an ideal reader, one attentive to his art and authorial performance.
Throughout his discussion of the eighteen prefaces, Pearson examines
the strategies that James implements for preparing the reader for
the prefaced texts. He argues that James sought to create the modern
reader, one who would learn to appreciate and discriminate his literary
art through reading the prefaces. By demonstrating that the prefaces
frame the novels and tales in aesthetic histories that are authorized
and authenticated by the author-historian's personal memory, Pearson
accomplishes his analysis of James's use of the frame and how it
systematically instructed the reader in the Jamesian aesthetic of
fiction. Through close readings of several of the novels and tales
including The Awkward Age, What Maisie Knew, The Portrait of
a Lady, The Aspern Papers, and The Wings of the Dove,
Pearson's comprehensive study examines the various framing strategies
at work and considers the broader theoretical implications of reading
through the prefaces.
Pearson's eclectic theoretical approach, similar to the recent
poststructural work of John Carlos Rowe, makes a complex argument
accessible to an educated reader untutored in recent poststructural
literary theory. |