Winner of the Nikolai Antsiferov Prize for Best Contribution to the Study of St. Petersburg by a foreign author.
Winner of the 2007 South Central MLA book prize.
In the bookshops of present-day St. Petersburg, guidebooks abound.
Both modern descriptions of Russia’s old imperial capital
and lavish new editions of pre-Revolutionary texts sell well, primarily
attracting an audience of local residents. Why do Russians read
one- and two-hundred-year-old guidebooks to a city they already
know well? In How St. Petersburg Learned to Study Itself, Emily
Johnson traces the Russian fascination with local guides to the
idea of kraevedenie.
Kraevedenie (local studies) is a disciplinary tradition
that in Russia dates back to the early twentieth century. Practitioners
of kraevedenie investigate local areas, study the ways human society
and the environment affect each other, and decipher the semiotics
of space. They deconstruct urban myths, analyze the conventions
governing the depiction of specific regions and towns in works
of art and literature, and dissect both outsider and insider perceptions
of local population groups. Practitioners of kraevedenie helped
develop and popularize the Russian guidebook as a literary form.
Johnson
traces the history of kraevedenie, showing how St. Petersburg–based
scholars and institutions have played a central role in the evolution
of the discipline. Distinguished from obvious Western equivalents
such as cultural geography and the German Heimatkunde by
both its dramatic history and unique social significance, kraevedenie has,
for close to a hundred years, served as a key forum for expressing
concepts of regional and national identity within Russian culture.
How
St. Petersburg Learned to Study Itself is published in collaboration
with the Harriman Institute at Columbia University as part of
its Studies of the Harriman Institute series. |