| Edgar
Degas's painting entitled "A Cotton Office in New Orleans" is one
of the most significant images of nineteenth-century capitalism, in
part because it was the first painting by an Impressionist to be purchased
by a museum. Drawing upon archival materials, Marilyn R. Brown explores
the accumulated social meanings of the work in light of shifting audiences
and changing market conditions and assesses the artist's complicated
relationship to the business of art.
Despite the financial failure of the actual cotton firm he represented,
Degas carefully constructed his picture with a particular buyer-a
British textile manufacturer-in mind. However, world events, including
an international stock market crash and declines in the market for
cotton and art, destroyed his hopes for this sale. It was under
these circumstances that the canvas was exhibited in the second
Impressionist show in Paris in 1876. While it received a more positive
response than other works exhibited, its success was with the conservative
audience. After considerable difficulty, Degas finally succeeded
in selling the painting in 1878 to the newly founded museum in the
city of Pau. The painting was probably regarded as an appropriate
homage to the old textile manufacturing family who funded its purchase.
It also appealed to "progressive" provincial and more cosmopolitan
audiences in Pau.
The picture's scattered form and atomized figures-in which some
interpreters today read evidence of the artist's own ambivalence
about capitalism-seemingly contributed to its "innovative" cachet
in Pau. But the private and public meanings of the painting had
shifted, in discontinuous fashion, between its production and consumption.
Under the circumstances, Degas's unfixed and even mixed messages
about business became, among other things, his most successful (if
unwitting) marketing strategy. The official recognition Degas received
in Pau in 1878 heralded the gradual upswing of his own financial
status during the 1880s, but his attitudes towards success remained
mixed. |
|
|