| An
inquiry into the preconditions for creating a viable scientific community
in an underdeveloped country.
Mexico is a developing society that only recently has begun to
fully appreciate the importance of technology to economic success.
It has had no clear vision of what the role of science is of how
a scientific community can be formed. Understandably, in these circumstances,
careers in science still do not have the status and recognition
that such professions as medicine, engineering, and law have traditionally
enjoyed.
A program to train students in biomedical research was launched
at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) in the early
1980s as an experiment in providing the conditions necessary for
fostering the growth of a scientific community in Mexico, where
teaching and research have hitherto been institutionally separated.
The authors, drawing on the methods and insights of anthropology,
psychology, and sociology, observed the process through which the
first two cohorts of students went in their training to become research
scientists, in interaction with both their professors and their
peers.
What this study show is that, while the learning of specialized
knowledge and techniques are necessary for becoming a scientist,
they are not sufficient: the role of beliefs and values is crucial.
The authors therefore focus attention on the ethos of science, the
ideal model underlying the process of socialization-how it was transmitted
to the students and how they assimilated it.
Their findings will be of interest to all scholars studying the
relationships of science, technology, and society, especially those
concerned about the special challenges underdeveloped countries
face in integrating themselves into the worldwide scientific community.
|
|
|
| Jacqueline
Fortes is a social psychologist who is currently President of
the Institute of the Family in Mexico City.
Larissa
Adler Lomnitz is an anthropologist who is affiliated with the
Institute of Applied Mathematics at UNAM and is co-author of A
Mexican Family, 1820-1980: Kinship, Class, and Culture (Princeton,
1988). |
|
|