| "In
this refreshing contrast to many commentators, Morgenstern does justice
to the complexity of Rousseau's work by drawing on his novels as well
as his explicity political writings."-Choice
"This book is a well-written, innovative, in-depth investigation
of the central themes of Rousseaus thought."-Ethics
"Morgenstern has earned the right to present her conclusions to
the scholarly world. Rousseau scholars should be encouraged to face
the difficulties she elaborates."-Hilail Gildin, Queens College,
CUNY
This new reading of Jean-Jacques Rousseau challenges traditional
views of the eighteenth-century political philosopher's attitudes
toward women and his perceived pessimism about human experience.
Mira Morgenstern finds in Rousseau an appreciation of the complexities
and multidimensionality of life that allowed him to criticize various
easy dualisms promoted by his fellow liberal thinkers and point
to the crucial mediating role that women fulfill between the private
and public spheres.
Morgenstern sees Rousseau as an important contributor to the feminist
thoughts and concerns that animate so much of our public and private
discourse today. While Rousseau is commonly seen as a patriarchal
misogynist, Morgenstern finds evidence in his writing that belies
much of this claim. Rousseau was very much a man of his time, but
he also believed that women were the key to transmitting his ideals
of personal and political authenticity, thereby transforming his
theory from ephemeral ideas into practical reality.
A careful evaluation of Rousseau's writings on women reveals his
highly complex sense of reality, especially his awareness that the
solutions to life's complex problems are often temporary and must
be renegotiated over time. Rousseau is more persistent than most
in highlighting the weaknesses and pitfalls of liberal political
thought, whose fundamental characteristic is its categorization
of life on the basis of dualistic categories: public and private,
outside and inside, male and female.
Ultimately, what makes Rousseau worth reading today, argues Morgenstern,
is his ability to illuminate critical weaknesses in the dualisms
of liberal political theory and his pointing out, if only by implication,
alternative ways of reaching the full measure of our individual
and communal humanity. In honoring the traditional liberal emphasis
on individual liberty and self-development, Rousseaus meditations
on the proper aim of political life are especially helpful to those
today who seek ways to expand liberalism's promise of freedom and
authenticity, while not losing sight of the common threads of meaning
and community that continue to bind us together. |