An effort to find a middle way in ethics between relativism and
foundationalism.
"Holland has a fine grasp of the overarching issues in ethics and
offers numerous insights into the history of Western ethics. Her
intelligent and challenging book attempts to broaden and deepen
the framework of contemporary ethical discourse."-Choice
"Nancy Holland has taken Heidegger's central concept of 'appropriation'
and shown how it can provide a springboard to a new and promising
approach to ethics. Her discussion is at once clear and creative
and will appeal to both Continental thinkers and Anglo-American
ethicists. Holland has removed Heidegger from the mystics and placed
him in conversation with those for whom the questions of right and
wrong are most urgent."-Todd May, author of The Moral Theory
of Poststructuralism
Taking Jean Giraudoux's play The Madwoman of Chaillot as
its starting point, this book seeks a way out of the dilemma that
confronts those who feel that any nonrelativistic moral theory requires
some metaphysical foundation but cannot see how a foundational position
can be persuasively defended.
Nancy Holland draws on the work of Heidegger and Derrida to formulate
a concept of appropriate action that can address both extraordinary
ethical problems within a particular cultural tradition and moral
conflict between different cultures. Her feminist reappropriation
of the concept of the appropriate is then further developed by reference
to Aristotle and Kant, whose ethical theories, she argues, are independent
of their metaphysics, thus suggesting that moral evaluation can
rely on a deep understanding of what it is to be human within a
cultural tradition rather than on foundational premises. As an example
of the application of her theory, Holland examines the problem of
ordaining women in the Roman Catholic Church and then goes on to
compare her approach with that of other philosophers working in
virtue theory, postmodern ethics, and feminism.
We all want to be able to make valid moral judgments and to respect
the ethical values of other cultural groups. By suggesting that
a culture's sense of the human, and a correlated sense of appropriate
action, might provide a purely formal but still critical perspective
on any community's current beliefs and practices without invoking
any substantive external criteria, the concept of the appropriate
is offered as one way in which we can satisfy both our moral wants
and our intellectual needs. |