Banner with links Email us Contact Us For Authors Ordering Information For Booksellers News & Events Our Journals Home About PSP Search P S U dot E D U Home Our Recent Books
Current Regional Subject Series Past Titles Awards
Search Inside This Book
Find this book in a library near you
 
  Our shopping cart is temporarily out of service. To order, please call our toll free number. 800-326-9180. Thank you.
 

Sartre on Violence
Curiously Ambivalent

By Ronald E. Santoni

2003 | 6 x 9 inches

Philosophy, History - European, Political Theory

Paperback: $20.95 SH
ISBN: 978-0-271-02301-4



 
   

 


 

"In this well-documented, provocative work, Professor Santoni uncovers and examines the ambivalences of Sartre's treatments of violence throughout his writings. In the process he interestingly resurrects the intellectual atmosphere of mid-twentieth-century France, paying special attention to one of the most famous polemics of the time, the Sartre-Camus clash over the latter's The Rebel. The timeliness of Santoni's contribution, at a moment when the word 'terrorism' has captured everyone's attention but the idea of it often appears murky and unclear, hardly needs to be underscored." —William L. McBride, Purdue University

"I do not know of anyone who has undertaken as thorough a study of both the early and later Sartre's 'curiously ambivalent' views on violence. One of the book's special strengths is that it makes significant use of Sartre's unpublished 1964 Rome Lecture as well as interviews he gave shortly before his death."—Thomas C. Anderson, Marquette University

From Materialism and Revolution (1946) through Hope Now (1980), Jean-Paul Sartre was deeply engaged with questions about the meaning and justifiability of violence. In the first comprehensive treatment of Sartre's views on the subject, Ronald Santoni begins by tracing the full trajectory of Sartre's evolving thought on violence and shows how the "curious ambiguity" of freedom affirming itself against freedom in his earliest writings about violence developed into his "curiously ambivalent" position through his later writings.

In the second part of the book, Santoni provides a detailed analysis of Sartre's debate with Camus in 1952 and his Rome Lecture in 1964. Santoni criticizes Sartre for scoffing at Camus's "limits" on violence while failing to articulate his own. And in the Rome Lecture, Santoni argues, Sartre still held a two-sided position: while acknowledging conditions for any legitimate use of terror, Sartre failed to show persuasively how revolutionary killing could be a vehicle for overcoming mass alienation or effecting the "new" humanity he sought.


   
Ronald E. Santoni is Maria Theresa Barney Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at Denison University and a Life Member of Clare Hall, Cambridge University. His previous books include Bad Faith, Good Faith, and Authenticity in Sartre's Early Philosophy (1995).