"Challenging Liberalism as a whole constitutes a defence of liberalism, but of a liberalism which attends to the actual distribution of power in society; the case is clearly presented and carefully argued." —A. W. B. Simpson, Times Literary Supplement
“Feminists often criticize liberalism as too abstract and
individualistic. Lisa Schwartzman argues, in her balanced evaluation,
that the real problems are instead that liberalism has been covertly
and concretely patriarchal and ignored the power structures of
sexual politics. Seeking to separate what is valuable in liberalism
from what is downright oppressive, she examines leading contemporary
texts (Rawls, Dworkin) and their feminist critics (Jaggar) and
defenders (O’Neill, Nussbaum), differentiating her critique
also from postmodernists (Brown, Butler). Her original approach
often evokes the response, ‘Of course!’ This is a stimulating
text for a seminar or advanced undergraduate course. It deserves
to be read by feminist philosophers and by scholars in women’s
studies, political science, law, and sociology.” —Claudia
F. Card, University of Wisconsin
“In her clear and engaging book, Lisa Schwartzman argues
that liberalism fails as a theory of justice because it fails to
uncover and resist oppression. Drawing on the work of Catharine
MacKinnon, Judith Butler, and Wendy Brown, she offers original,
feminist critiques of Nussbaum, Rawls, Okin, and Dworkin. This
book will be of interest to political philosophers from both liberal
and feminist schools as well as legal theorists.” —Ann
E. Cudd, University of Kansas
Questions about the relevance and value of various liberal concepts
are at the heart of important debates among feminist philosophers
and social theorists. Although many feminists invoke concepts such
as rights, equality, autonomy, and freedom in arguments for liberation,
some attempt to avoid them, noting that they can also reinforce
and perpetuate oppressive social structures. In Challenging
Liberalism Schwartzman explores the reasons why concepts such as rights and
equality can sometimes reinforce oppression. She argues that certain
forms of abstraction and individualism are central to liberal methodology
and that these give rise to a number of problems. Drawing on the
work of feminist moral, political, and legal theorists, she constructs
an approach that employs these concepts, while viewing them from
within a critique of social relations of power. |
|
Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part One A Feminist Critique of Liberalism
1 Individualism, Oppression, and Liberal Rights Theory
2 Abstract Ideals and Social Inequality: Dworkin’s Equality of Resources
3 Rawlsian Abstraction and the Social Position of Women
Part Two Abstraction, Ideals, and Feminist Methodologies
4 Idealization, Abstraction, and the Use of Ideals in Feminist Critique
5 Feminism as an Alternative Methodology
Part Three Feminist Postmodernism: An Alternative to Liberalism?
6 Politicized Identity, Women’s Experience, and the Law
7 Speech, Authority, and Social Context
Conclusion: Toward a Feminist Approach to Political Theorizing
Notes
Bibliography
Index
|
|