|
"Gendered Paradoxes takes us through the complex processes though which women in Ecuador have increased their participation in the country's political, social, and economic battlegrounds since the 1980s. Drawing on extensive ethnographic fieldwork and based on a good understanding of gender analysis, Amy Lind describes how women have negotiated with the state and gained visibility within the context of neoliberal policies and gender politics. Analyzing the different strands of feminism that have shaped activism, she shows how they have contributed to rethinking democratic governance while mobilizing themselves to encounter the 'contradictions of modernization and development.' The book is an important contribution to the literature on gender and development in Latin America."
--Lourdes Benería, Cornell University, author of Gender, Development and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered
“A nuanced
and critical reading of gender, development, and globalization issues.
Lind’s panoramic analysis of Ecuadorian women’s negotiations
with development projects, the
state, neoliberal adjustment policies, and NGOs provides a theoretical
framework and an ethnographic account of issues with a global resonance.
Exploring the gendered political cultures of development in Ecuador,
she analyses the contradictory processes by which gender, institutions,
and political movements come together in the uneven process of neoliberal
restructuring.”
—Sarah A. Radcliffe, University of Cambridge
“Amy Lind
provides an excellent account of the paradoxes of gendered neoliberal
politics in a country about which little on this topic has been
published. Through a detailed analysis of women’s organizational
and community survival strategies, the author ably demonstrates
how women’s politics both
reshape and are shaped by the dynamics of neoliberalism. Tackling
the essential task of ‘making feminist sense of neoliberalism,’
Lind’s timely study provides invaluable insights into the
contradictions of development and globalization.”
—Lynne Phillips, University of Windsor
Since
the early 1980s Ecuador has experienced a series of events unparalleled
in its history. Its “free market” strategies exacerbated
the debt crisis, and in response new forms of social movement organizing
arose among the country’s poor, including women’s groups.
Gendered Paradoxes focuses on women’s participation in the
political and economic restructuring process of the past twenty-five
years, showing how in their daily struggle for survival Ecuadorian
women have both reinforced and embraced the neoliberal model yet
also challenged its exclusionary nature.
Drawing on her extensive ethnographic fieldwork and employing an
approach combining political economy and cultural politics, Amy
Lind charts the growth of several strands of women’s activism
and identifies how they have helped redefine, often in contradictory
ways, the real and imagined boundaries of neoliberal development
discourse and practice. In her analysis of this ambivalent and “unfinished”
cultural project of modernity in the Andes, she examines state policies
and their effects on women of various social sectors; women’s
community development initiatives and responses to the debt crisis;
and the roles played by feminist “issue networks” in
reshaping national and international policy agendas in Ecuador and
in developing a transnationally influenced, locally based feminist
movement. |
|
Contents
List of Tables and Figures
Preface and Acknowledgments
List of Acronyms
Introduction
1 Myths of Progress: Gender, Citizenship, and Modernization in Ecuador
2 Ecuadorian Neoliberalisms and Gender Politics in Context
3 Neoliberal Encounters: State Restructuring and the Institutionalization
of Women’s Struggles for Survival
4 Women’s Community Organizing in Quito: The Paradoxes of Survival
and Struggle
5 Remaking the Nation: Feminist Politics, Populist Nationalism, and
the 1998
Constitutional Reforms
6 Making Dollars, Making Feminist Sense of Neoliberalism: Negotiations,
Paradoxes, Futures
Appendix: Chronology of Events
Bibliography
Index |
|